TEACHING AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Australian Federal Constitutional Law: Commentary and Materials, by G WINTERTON, HP LEE, A GLASS and JA THOMSON (Australia: LBC
ثبت نشده
چکیده
Teachers of Australian federal constitutional law now have three current casebooks available to them: the Winterton, Lee, Glass and Thomson casebook (“WLGT”), Hanks and Cass, Australian Constitutional Law: Materials and Commentary (“HC”), now in its sixth edition, and Blackshield and Williams, Australian Constitutional Law & Theory (“BW”), which has entered a second edition. The recent publication of WLGT provides an opportunity to review it in the context of these other works. WLGT consists of ten chapters, eight of which deal with topics of substantive constitutional law, framed by an introductory chapter on ‘Australian Constitutionalism’ and a concluding chapter on ‘Constitutional Interpretation’. The eight substantive chapters deal with ‘Inconsistency’, ‘Commerce and Corporations’, ‘External Affairs and Defence’, ‘Commonwealth Financial Powers’, ‘Freedom of Interstate Trade’, ‘Excise Duties’, ‘Rights and Freedoms’ and ‘Intergovernmental Immunities’. WLGT also includes a Table of Cases, a Table of Statutes, two Appendices setting out the Justices of the High Court, an extensive Bibliography and Index. Each section of the book typically consists of a brief introduction to a particular case, an extract from the case, followed by notes which raise questions for discussion. As in all academic endeavour, selection is unavoidable, and the richness of the available material in Australian constitutional law renders this necessity all the more arduous, as well as regrettable. What principles of selection guide us as teachers and scholars? While many of us will probably want to resist any categorical statement of the confines and scope of the courses that we teach, in practice at least some limits must be adopted, if only to give due regard to the dictates of professional bodies and faculty decisions regarding curriculum
منابع مشابه
Human Rights and the Second Century of the Australian Constitution
In many countries with a written constitution, constitutional development in the second half of the 20th century was dominated by concepts of human rights. For example, Canada and South Africa gained Bills of Rights* 1 while the United States saw an existing Bill of Rights expanded through judicial interpretation. In other nations, international norms and the proliferation of treaties and conve...
متن کاملConstitutional limits on federal legislation practically compelling medical employment: Wong v Commonwealth; Selim v Professional Services Review Committee.
A recent decision by the High Court of Australia (Wong v Commonwealth; Selim v Professional Services Review Committee (2009) 236 CLR 573) (the PSR case) has not only clarified the scope of the Australian constitutional prohibition on "any form of civil conscription" in relation to federal legislation concerning medical or dental services (s 51xxiiiA), but has highlighted its importance as a gre...
متن کاملAn Australian August Corpus: Why There is Only One Common Law in Australia
For nearly 100 years following federation there was not a settled view as to whether there existed but one common law in Australia, as opposed to a common law for each polity in the Australian federation. This article investigates why that was so. It considers the constitutional and juristic underpinnings of the now established position that there is a single common law in Australia, identifyin...
متن کاملLost in Translation: from Political Communication to Legal Communication?
APLA Limited v Legal Services Commissioner (NSW)2 (‘APLA’), decided in September this year, had the potential to be a landmark decision in the field of implied constitutional freedoms comparable to Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd v Commonwealth3 (‘ACTV’) and Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Wills4 (‘Nationwide News’). In the two latter cases the High Court concluded that the provision for a syst...
متن کاملAdministrative "health courts" for medical injury claims: the federal constitutional issues.
Our article analyzes whether the federal government may constitutionally supplant a traditional system of common-law trials before state judges and juries with new federal institutions designed by statute for compensating victims of medical injuries. Specifically, this article examines the federal constitutional issues raised by various proposals to replace traditional medical malpractice litig...
متن کامل